About MYBPD Test
BPD Test is a free educational website that helps adults reflect on patterns and find reputable information. It is not a clinic, crisis service, diagnostic provider, or substitute for professional care.
Understanding What MYBPD Test Can and Cannot Provide
What the site provides
- a 20-prompt educational self-reflection checklist
- descriptive summaries across five reflection themes
- source-backed introductions to symptoms, assessment, treatment, and recovery
- links to professional and crisis resources
What it does not provide
- a diagnosis, probability, severity score, or clinical risk rating
- the MSI-BPD or another validated clinical instrument
- personalized medical advice, treatment, or crisis intervention
- an account, medical record, or clinician review of results
- Checklist version 2.0.0
Checklist methodology
01
Prompt design
The custom checklist contains four prompts in each of five themes: emotional patterns, relationship patterns, sense of self, impulsive reactions, and stress responses. Every prompt uses the same past-three-month timeframe and five-point frequency scale.
02
How summaries are calculated
The browser averages the four responses within each theme and maps that average to a frequency description. Themes are equally represented. The site does not convert the total into a disease probability or clinical threshold.
03
Safety boundary
An optional direct safety question is separate from scoring, storage, and analytics. Crisis support remains visible regardless of answers because a general checklist cannot assess immediate safety.
04
Data boundary
Progress and results are stored in localStorage on the user’s device. Advertising and analytics still load site-wide, but checklist answers, theme summaries, and the safety response are not sent as analytics or ad parameters by the application.
Editorial process
Educational pages prioritize primary public-health and clinical-guideline sources, currently including the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health and NICE. Sources are linked beside the claims they support or in a clearly labeled source section.
We avoid unsupported prevalence or outcome percentages, invented testimonials, professional-review claims without named evidence, and language that presents the checklist as clinical. Material pages display a reviewed date and should be rechecked when guidance or crisis resources change.
No named clinician or medical reviewer is claimed because the project does not currently document one.
- Questions